performance - Need to fasten my Java code -


i'm trying solve problem spoj. problem me not actual difficulty of algorithm; performance of java code results in time limit exceeded error.

i heard java notorious slow performance on contest problems compared c/c++; however, language in can code java. thus, asking suggestions make code neater , faster. below solution , source problem.

public class nextpalindrome {   public static biginteger secondhalf(biginteger b) {     string s = b.tostring();     int n = s.length();     if(n==1){         return b;     }     string end = s.substring((n + 1) / 2, n);     biginteger end = new biginteger(end);     return end;  }   public static biginteger reverse(biginteger b) {     string s = b.tostring();     int n = s.length();     string beg = b.tostring();     string reversebeg = "";     while (true) {         (int = n - 1; >= 0; i--) {             reversebeg = reversebeg + beg.charat(i);         }         break;     }     biginteger reverse = new biginteger(reversebeg);      return reverse;  }   public static biginteger firsthalf(biginteger b) {     string s = b.tostring();     int n = s.length();     if(n==1){         return b;     }     string beg = s.substring(0, n / 2);     biginteger beg = new biginteger(beg);     return beg;  }   public static biginteger nextpalindrom(biginteger b) {      string s = b.tostring();      int n = s.length();     if(n==1){         if(b.equals(9)){             return biginteger.valueof(11);         } else {             return b.add(biginteger.valueof(1));         }     }     if (n % 2 == 1&&n>1) {         character c = s.charat(n / 2);         string c = c.tostring();         biginteger med = new biginteger(c);         biginteger beg = firsthalf(b);          biginteger end = secondhalf(b);          if (reverse(beg).compareto(end) <= 0) {             beg.add(biginteger.valueof(1));             if (med.compareto(biginteger.valueof(9)) == 0) {                 c = '0';             } else {                 med = med.add(biginteger.valueof(1));             }         }         string temp = beg.tostring();         string temp1 = reverse(beg).tostring();         c = med.tostring();         string result = temp + c;         result = result.concat(temp1);         biginteger b = new biginteger(result);          return b;     }     biginteger beg = firsthalf(b);      biginteger end = secondhalf(b);      if (reverse(beg).compareto(end) <= 0) {         beg = beg.add(biginteger.valueof(1));      }     string temp = beg.tostring();     string temp1 = reverse(beg).tostring();      string result = temp.concat(temp1);     biginteger b = new biginteger(result);     return b;   }   public static void main(string[] args)throws ioexception {      bufferedreader in = new bufferedreader(new inputstreamreader(system.in));     string s = in.readline();     int n = integer.parseint(s);     (int = 0; < n; i++) {         biginteger big = new biginteger(in.readline());         biginteger palindrom = nextpalindrom(big);         system.out.println(palindrom);     }   } } 

biginteger used precise calculations, slow. int or long better here.

and there many conversions , string, slow, too.

and slow string operations...

so recommend use int or long , static helper methods of integer or long manipulate raw bits of numbers.

that should lead best performance of program.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SPSS keyboard combination alters encoding -

Add new record to the table by click on the button in Microsoft Access -

javascript - jQuery .height() return 0 when visible but non-0 when hidden -