javascript - "" VS url-to-folder when set html img's src -
i use pywebkit , html5 develope desktop map server.
map tiles store in sqlite database.
so when set html img's src, have 2 options.
one read image database , b64encode it, set img's src "-string".
another read image database , save on disk, set img's src url local folder.
my question way better.
i concerned rendering speed. 1 faster browser render images.
<img src="http://mysite.com/images/myimage.jpg" /> http uri scheme, while <img src="....." /> data uri, way image inlined in html , there no http request embedded images can’t cached between different page loads in cases, solution goes through way...what better , convenient overlook ian suggested :)
now move browser compatibility -
data uri's don't work in ie 5-7, supported in ie 8. source
page size:
base64 encoding increases page size well, thing at.
Comments
Post a Comment