javascript - "" VS url-to-folder when set html img's src -


i use pywebkit , html5 develope desktop map server.

map tiles store in sqlite database.

so when set html img's src, have 2 options.

  1. one read image database , b64encode it, set img's src "-string".

  2. another read image database , save on disk, set img's src url local folder.

my question way better.

i concerned rendering speed. 1 faster browser render images.

<img src="http://mysite.com/images/myimage.jpg" /> http uri scheme, while <img src="....." /> data uri, way image inlined in html , there no http request embedded images can’t cached between different page loads in cases, solution goes through way...what better , convenient overlook ian suggested :)

now move browser compatibility -

data uri's don't work in ie 5-7, supported in ie 8. source

page size:

base64 encoding increases page size well, thing at.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

.htaccess - First slash is removed after domain when entering a webpage in the browser -

Automatically create pages in phpfox -

c# - Farseer ContactListener is not working -